Looks like its time to look for a new helmet even though my KBC FFR did fine during my accident back in June of this year. The fact though that it its chin portion only stayed locked in place 43% of time time during SHARP's testing is very worrisome though.
From the SHARP site:
SHARP is the Safety Helmet Assessment and Rating Programme - it's the new helmet safety scheme for motorcyclists.
SHARP enables riders to more easily select a helmet which matches their needs. It provides consumers with an independent assessment of the safety performance of helmets sold in the UK. The SHARP RATING reflects the performance of each helmet model following a series of advanced laboratory tests and rates helmets from 1-5 stars.
More from Mike Werner's posting:
The first 20 have been entered in their extensive database:
Make | Model | Rating |
AGV | Longway | 4 |
Airoh | Matisse RS | 2 |
BMW | System 5 | 5 |
Caberg | Trip | 5 |
Justissimo GT | 4 | |
Duchinni | D601 | 1 |
G-MAC | Concept | 3 |
Grex | RF2 | 4 |
KBC | FFR | 1 |
Lazer | Granville | 4 |
Revolution | 4 | |
Nolan | N103 | 4 |
N102 | 4 | |
ROOF | Boxer | 4 |
Schuberth | C2 | 4 |
Shark | Openline | 3 |
Evoline | 4 | |
Shoei | Multitech | 3 |
Viper | RS V121 | 3 |
RS RS101 | 4 |
Update: There's apparently some "debate" as to SHARP's criteria and use of test data and testing protocol creation. Unsurprisingly, some helmet manufacturers are not happy with the results published on their products. More details here on webbikeworld.com: LINK
No comments:
Post a Comment